The Future of U.S. Education—A Shift Toward Tradition?

In the aftermath of Donald Trump’s presidency, education reform remains a hot-button issue. As schools across the United States continue to grapple with challenges such as curriculum debates, student mental health, and funding crises, the former president’s approach to education has sparked intense debate. Central to Trump’s vision for reform is the intersection of traditional values, patriotism, and religious expression—elements he has championed throughout his political career. With education playing a pivotal role in shaping the future of American society, it is crucial to understand the scope of Trump’s proposals and the potential impact they may have on students, educators, and communities nationwide.

From advocating for the return of prayer in schools to promoting a more patriotic curriculum, Trump’s education platform is seen by supporters as a return to American ideals, while critics argue it risks undermining public education’s core mission of inclusivity and intellectual rigor. This article examines the key elements of Trump’s education reform proposals, providing a balanced analysis of their implications for the future of U.S. schools.

A Call for Prayer: Religion’s Role in Public Schools

One of the most controversial aspects of Trump’s education policy was his vocal support for reinstating prayer in public schools. In 2019, he signed an executive order promoting religious freedom in education, which included a push for allowing prayer in schools, particularly around the holiday season.

Trump’s stance on this issue resonated with many conservative and religious groups, who argued that the absence of prayer from schools was a form of cultural erosion. According to Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, “Prayer in schools is a fundamental right, and it is an essential part of American culture that we’ve lost over the years.”

However, legal challenges loom over this idea. The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in *Engel v. Vitale* (1962) ruled that mandatory prayer in public schools violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits government endorsement of religion. Critics of Trump’s proposal, including legal scholars and civil liberties groups, assert that any move to reintroduce prayer in schools could run afoul of this constitutional principle.

In practice, schools already allow students to pray voluntarily, but Trump’s calls for more organized religious expression in the classroom reflect a broader ideological struggle over the role of religion in public life. Advocates argue that religious freedom should be fully integrated into the educational experience, while opponents warn that it risks alienating students from diverse faith backgrounds or no religious affiliation at all.

 Patriotism in the Classroom: Reviving American Ideals

A cornerstone of Trump’s education vision has been a call for a greater emphasis on patriotism within school curriculums. In 2020, he launched the “1776 Commission,” an advisory group tasked with promoting an education agenda centered on American history and the founding principles of the nation. The commission’s report, released in January 2021, argued that K-12 schools should teach a more “patriotic” narrative, one that highlights the achievements of the United States while downplaying critical race theory and the country’s history of slavery and racial injustice.

Critics argue that this approach could lead to an oversimplified or sanitized version of history, one that minimizes the struggles and complexities of the nation’s past. Dr. Ibram X. Kendi, author of *How to Be an Antiracist*, pointed out that, “A patriotic education should not ignore the injustices that America has committed, but rather, teach students how to reckon with them constructively.”

However, supporters of the 1776 Commission see it as a necessary corrective to what they view as an overemphasis on the darker aspects of American history in school curricula. According to Trump, the American education system had become “indoctrinated by left-wing ideology” and needed to focus on unity and national pride rather than divisiveness. In a speech during his presidency, he remarked, “We need to teach our children to love their country, not hate it.”

In practice, schools already face a delicate balance in teaching American history. While many educators advocate for a comprehensive approach that includes the positive and negative aspects of the nation’s past, Trump’s push for “patriotism education” could reshape state standards and curricula, potentially influencing how students engage with their national identity.

 Policy Overhaul: Expanding School Choice and Defunding the Department of Education

Beyond cultural and ideological shifts, Trump’s education reform also proposed more concrete changes to the structure of the U.S. education system, particularly in the realm of school choice. Throughout his tenure, Trump was a staunch advocate for expanding charter schools, private school vouchers, and other forms of school choice, arguing that they would provide families with more opportunities and improve education outcomes.

Additionally, Trump’s administration advocated for a reduction in the federal role in education, including proposals to defund the Department of Education. By shifting more control to local and state governments, Trump argued, schools could be more responsive to community needs. While such decentralization would give states more autonomy, critics warned it could lead to greater disparities in educational quality across the country, particularly in underserved areas.

Teacher’s Union vs. Reformers: The Politics of Education

Trump’s education reform also encountered resistance from teachers’ unions, who consistently pushed back against his policy proposals. The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA), two of the largest teachers’ unions in the country, voiced strong opposition to Trump’s push for school choice and his attempts to cut federal funding for public education.

Randi Weingarten, president of the AFT, called the expansion of charter schools “an attempt to dismantle public education” and criticized the administration’s lack of support for teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. “Instead of focusing on what students and teachers need to succeed, this administration has spent more time playing politics,” Weingarten stated.

Despite this opposition, Trump’s education reform gained significant traction with conservative voters, particularly in swing states. His stance on school choice was one of the key issues in the 2020 election, with Trump framing it as a fight for parental rights and educational freedom.

The Legacy of Trump’s Education Reform—A Divisive Vision for the Future

Trump’s education reform proposals have undoubtedly left a lasting imprint on the national conversation about public education. Whether one agrees with his vision or not, his approach reflects a broader ideological divide over the role of education in shaping American society. While his calls for prayer in schools and a more patriotic curriculum resonate with many who seek a return to traditional values, critics worry that these policies may risk alienating marginalized groups and oversimplifying the complex history of the nation.

As the U.S. continues to debate the future of its education system, Trump’s proposals will likely continue to serve as a focal point for discussions about the intersection of politics, culture, and public policy. Ultimately, the challenge for lawmakers, educators, and communities will be finding ways to balance a respect for tradition with a commitment to inclusivity and academic rigor—an endeavor that will shape the educational landscape for generations to come.

President-Elect Donald Trump announced over the weekend his plan for public education of America’s youth. What he said is historic:

• “First, we will respect parents’ right to control their children’s education.

• “Second, we will empower parents and local school boards to hire and reward great principals and teachers and fire those who perform below par.

• “Third, we will ensure our classrooms are focused not on political indoctrination but on teaching the knowledge and skills needed to succeed – reading, writing, math, science, arithmetic, and other beneficial subjects.

• “Fourth, we will prepare students to love their country and not hate it like they’re trained [to do] now.

• “Fifth, we will support bringing back prayer to our schools.

• “Sixth, we will achieve safe, secure, and drug-free schools with immediate expulsion for any student who harms a teacher or another student.

• “Seventh, we will give all parents the right to choose another school for their children: School Choice.

• “Eighth, we will ensure students can access project-based learning experiences to help train them for meaningful work outside the classroom.

• “Ninth, we will strive to give all students access to internships and work experiences that can set them on a path to their first job. They’re going to be very, very successful. I want them to be more successful than Trump; I will [then] be the happiest person in the world.

•  “Tenth, another thing I’ll be doing very early in the administration is closing up the Department of Education in Washington, DC, and sending all education back to the states. We’re going to end education coming out of Washington, DC. We’re going to close it up, all those buildings all over the place, and yet, people who, in many cases, hate our children. We’re going to send it all back to the states.

Twitter>See